From idea to finished product in weeks, not months.

The quality of the result is directly tied to the quality of the requirements, that's a fundamental rule in software development. The clearer the goal, the closer the result comes to expectations. In some cases, a deliberately open start makes sense, for instance when exploring possibilities first. In most projects, however, precise requirements are truly critical. That's why a requirements workshop is included in all packages after project confirmation, typically 3 to 5 hours. Depending on scope and complexity, this can be extended, which we discuss in advance. What doesn't work: starting a project and leaving scope alignment to chance.

For companies, teams, or product owners who want to validate digital ideas quickly, pilot them internally, or test them with real users, without long lead times and without unnecessary complexity. Especially relevant for SMEs without an in-house tech team, corporate innovation teams, business units with a digital idea, or organisations that want to test an MVP before a larger investment.

Not every initiative suits this approach, and that's fine. If the scope is still entirely open and no concrete core process can be named, if heavily regulated enterprise processes such as complex legacy migrations or compliance certifications dominate the project, or if the primary goal is detailed requirements documentation rather than a testable result, then a different approach makes more sense. digitario says so openly in the first conversation, and names what would make more sense in your particular situation.

The Rapid Prototype is ideal for a clearly defined core process, fast validation, or a first internally usable solution, delivered in 5 business days. The Mature MVP goes a step further: with a technical foundation for real-world use, user login, backend, data storage, and standard integrations, ready for pilot customers or a controlled market launch.

Yes. In clearly defined cases, a Rapid Prototype can go well beyond a classic clickable prototype. When scope, requirements, and complexity allow, it can already become a lean, production-usable first solution. This is clarified in the kick-off workshop.

The stack follows the use case. Typical for web: React/Next.js, TypeScript, Tailwind, Supabase or PostgreSQL. For mobile: React Native or Flutter. Backend: Node.js, Python or PHP depending on requirements. API integrations: Google Workspace, Stripe, Slack, Microsoft 365, Twilio and many more. The concrete stack is discussed in the first conversation.

Included: development, technical documentation and a handover session. Not included: hosting, ongoing cloud costs and third-party licenses (e.g. API keys). Handover is as a fully deployable solution, you decide where and how it is hosted. I'm happy to recommend suitable hosting providers on request.

Yes. Many projects start as a Rapid Prototype and then develop further through multiple iterations. Additional features can be commissioned as a Feature Package (smaller changes) or as a new project scope (larger extensions).

Hosting and ongoing operations are currently not within digitario's scope. Handover is as a fully documented, deployable solution, including deployment guide. I'm happy to recommend suitable hosting partners (Switzerland or DACH) on request.

Yes, with React Native, a shared codebase for web and mobile is possible. This affects project duration and price accordingly. We discuss details in the first conversation.

After the first conversation (free, 30 min.) and a clear scope document, development begins. You receive daily updates and have direct access at all times. Feedback is incorporated quickly. No ticket system, no waiting across multiple levels, direct communication with the developer.